*
'Hard to foresee what will happen in the future before it
happens, but after a while you can see a bit more
clearly...' -- Jean Guernon, Wednesday, November 5, 2003.
*
Have a nice day, folks!
*
Claude Latrémouille
July 16, 2007
http://web.ncf.ca/cj559
*
=== ===
=== CLAUDE LATRÉMOUILLE ===
===========================
.
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Worth framing? |
16 Jul 2007 07:34:26 AM |
|
|
On Jul 16, 1:35 pm, (Claude Latremouille)
wrote:
*
'Hard to foresee what will happen in the future before it
happens, but after a while you can see a bit more
clearly...' -- Jean Guernon, Wednesday, November 5, 2003.
*
Have a nice day, folks!
*
Claude Latr=E9mouille
July 16, 2007http://web.ncf.ca/cj559
*
=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D
=3D=3D=3D CLAUDE LATR=C9MOUILLE =3D=3D=3D
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
As opposed to wild assumptions that have failed to materialise,
LB
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Werewolfy" |
|
| Title: Re: Worth framing? |
16 Jul 2007 01:44:25 AM |
|
|
On Jul 16, 4:35=EF=BF=BDam, (Claude Latremouille)
wrote:
*
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0'Hard to foresee what will happen in the future before it
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0happens, but after a while you can see a bit more
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0clearly...' -- Jean Guernon, Wednesday, November 5, 2003.
I rather like that. Yes, I know you posted it to deride Guernon, and
Heaven knows, there are times when such derision is deserved. This is
not one such.
It is worth framing, or use a a 'signature'. Ranks along with the most
thought-provoking of remarks.
Werewolfy
.
|
|
|
| User: "mukyuk" |
|
| Title: Re: Worth framing? |
14 Aug 2007 04:42:43 PM |
|
|
"Werewolfy" <Werewolfy1@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1184568265.979329.219740@n2g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
On Jul 16, 4:35?am, (Claude Latremouille)
wrote:
*
'Hard to foresee what will happen in the future before it
happens, but after a while you can see a bit more
clearly...' -- Jean Guernon, Wednesday, November 5, 2003.
I rather like that. Yes, I know you posted it to deride Guernon, and
Heaven knows, there are times when such derision is deserved. This is
not one such.
It is worth framing, or use a a 'signature'. Ranks along with the most
thought-provoking of remarks.
It was so clever. I wonder if he intended that?
Werewolfy
.
|
|
|
| User: "Werewolfy" |
|
| Title: Re: Worth framing? |
14 Aug 2007 06:36:35 PM |
|
|
On Aug 14, 10:42=EF=BF=BDpm, "mukyuk" <a...@b.com> wrote:
It was so clever. =A0I wonder if he intended that?
Probably not, difficult to say really. The result was good though.
Claude's post rather back-fired on this one..;)
Mind, Claude's post's do that quite a lot!
Werewolfy
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
