Keith Olberman commentary:
http://www.crooksandliars.com/2007/12/06/countdown-special-comment-the-nie-reflects-an-unhinged-irrational-chicken-little-of-a-president/
We have either a president who is too dishonest to restrain himself
from invoking World War Three about Iran at least six weeks after he
had to have known that the analogy would be fantastic, irresponsible
hyperbole -- or we have a president too transcendently stupid not to
have asked -- at what now appears to have been a series of
opportunities to do so -- whether the fairy tales he either created or
was fed, were still even remotely plausible.
A pathological presidential liar, or an idiot-in-chief. It is the
nightmare scenario of political science fiction: A critical juncture
in our history and, contained in either answer, a president manifestly
unfit to serve, and behind him in the vice presidency: an unapologetic
war-monger who has long been seeing a world visible only to himself.
.
|
|
| User: "Pers3id" |
|
| Title: Re: Yeah, Who Needs Donahue? |
08 Dec 2007 11:57:10 PM |
|
|
John Lemke <jflemke@locallink.net> wrote in
news:c6961f33-5916-43b9-b224-7a75456e7793@i29g2000prf.googlegroups.com:
Keith Olberman commentary:
http://www.crooksandliars.com/2007/12/06/countdown-special-comment-the-
nie-reflects-an-unhinged-irrational-chicken-little-of-a-president/
We have either a president who is too dishonest to restrain himself
from invoking World War Three about Iran at least six weeks after he
had to have known that the analogy would be fantastic, irresponsible
hyperbole -- or we have a president too transcendently stupid not to
have asked -- at what now appears to have been a series of
opportunities to do so -- whether the fairy tales he either created or
was fed, were still even remotely plausible.
A pathological presidential liar, or an idiot-in-chief.
'das Chimpenfuhrer' as marv likes to call him.
stephen likes to call him 'my Commander'.
I think I likes marv's way better.. that commander thing carries such
sexual undertones.
It is the
nightmare scenario of political science fiction: A critical juncture
in our history and, contained in either answer, a president manifestly
unfit to serve, and behind him in the vice presidency: an unapologetic
war-monger who has long been seeing a world visible only to himself.
.
|
|
|
| User: "John Lemke" |
|
| Title: Re: Yeah, Who Needs Donahue? |
09 Dec 2007 08:44:29 AM |
|
|
On Dec 9, 12:57 am, Pers3id <pers...@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
John Lemke <jfle...@locallink.net> wrote innews:c6961f33-5916-43b9-b224-7a75456e7793@i29g2000prf.googlegroups.com:
Keith Olberman commentary:
http://www.crooksandliars.com/2007/12/06/countdown-special-comment-the-
nie-reflects-an-unhinged-irrational-chicken-little-of-a-president/
We have either a president who is too dishonest to restrain himself
from invoking World War Three about Iran at least six weeks after he
had to have known that the analogy would be fantastic, irresponsible
hyperbole -- or we have a president too transcendently stupid not to
have asked -- at what now appears to have been a series of
opportunities to do so -- whether the fairy tales he either created or
was fed, were still even remotely plausible.
A pathological presidential liar, or an idiot-in-chief.
'das Chimpenfuhrer' as marv likes to call him.
stephen likes to call him 'my Commander'.
I think I likes marv's way better.. that commander thing carries such
sexual undertones.
Marv's intimate photo of Condi and the Chimp shows clearly who the
commander always is and who the cabin boy always is.
He's probably got one of Bush and Deferment ***** also.
But we want to keep things issue oriented, not going off on some
personal tangent and keep it clear that Bush is a pathetic,
incorrigible lying *****.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Steven Douglas" |
|
| Title: Re: Yeah, Who Needs Donahue? |
08 Dec 2007 08:52:15 PM |
|
|
On Dec 8, 4:55 pm, John Lemke <jfle...@locallink.net> wrote:
Yeah, Who Needs Donahue?
Donahue was a shy, retiring gentleman compared to his replacement,
wasn't he?
Keith Olberman commentary:
http://www.crooksandliars.com/2007/12/06/countdown-special-comment-th...
We have either a president who is too dishonest to restrain himself
from invoking World War Three about Iran at least six weeks after he
had to have known that the analogy would be fantastic, irresponsible
hyperbole -- or we have a president too transcendently stupid not to
have asked -- at what now appears to have been a series of
opportunities to do so -- whether the fairy tales he either created or
was fed, were still even remotely plausible.
A pathological presidential liar, or an idiot-in-chief. It is the
nightmare scenario of political science fiction: A critical juncture
in our history and, contained in either answer, a president manifestly
unfit to serve, and behind him in the vice presidency: an unapologetic
war-monger who has long been seeing a world visible only to himself.
.
|
|
|
| User: "John Lemke" |
|
| Title: Re: Yeah, Who Needs Donahue? |
09 Dec 2007 08:38:56 AM |
|
|
On Dec 8, 9:52 pm, Steven Douglas <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote:
On Dec 8, 4:55 pm, John Lemke <jfle...@locallink.net> wrote:
Yeah, Who Needs Donahue?
Donahue was a shy, retiring gentleman compared to his replacement,
wasn't he?
I'd vote for either one of them for the Nobel Truthtelling Prize.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
