Dani
wrote:
tonyz2001@aol.com (TonyZ2001) wrote:
Marvin The Paranoid Android >marv@galaxy.com
wrote:
I've stated Bush was an ***** months ago ... what's your point? Saddam
supports me?
Nope, that you and your ilk are of the >>same mind of Saddam Hussein.
Congratulations.
You do know that you're on my list of >people who support Al-Queda,
don't you, Tony? Well, son, I regret having to have put you there,
but you're now there and you won't be >coming off any time soon.
I see that you have decided to dig in deeper with the Anti-American trash on
this group.
I heard that Bin Laden thinks that >Saddam sucks you know.. and.. and
since you also think Saddam sucks - >well, jeeeez! What other possible
conclusion can be made here!?
You are so stupid that it's not even funny anymore.
Congratulations you terrorist supporting >***** ***** anti-American
lying filthy scum of the earth Bin Laden >loving loser.
Dani
No dear, it is you and your buddies on this group that support Saddam Hussein
adn who are in comeplete agreement with him politcally against President Bush.
Now since Al Qeada and Saddam's supporters have joined forces in Iraq, it can
be said that you and your ilk now support both Saddam, and Bin Laden.
Keep digging Dani, you are now in so deep with the Terorrist supporters of this
group that you are beyond help.
Tony
.
|
|
| User: "Absolute Zero" |
|
| Title: Re: Yet more lies from Dani |
10 Jul 2004 06:03:53 PM |
|
|
214
(makes a change from counting lines, 10)
-A
Tony in alt.drugs.hard
"What is the going price for Oxcodone 40mg tab on the street?"
"Wow!
That much? I'm sitting on 200 of these jokers. Thanks for the info."
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: Yet more lies from Dani |
10 Jul 2004 06:05:58 PM |
|
|
In article <20040710121924.19227.00001729@mb-m06.aol.com>, (TonyZ2001) wrote:
Dani
wrote:
(TonyZ2001) wrote:
Marvin The Paranoid Android >marv@galaxy.com
wrote:
I've stated Bush was an ***** months ago ... what's your point? Saddam
supports me?
Nope, that you and your ilk are of the >>same mind of Saddam Hussein.
Congratulations.
You do know that you're on my list of >people who support Al-Queda,
don't you, Tony? Well, son, I regret having to have put you there,
but you're now there and you won't be >coming off any time soon.
I see that you have decided to dig in deeper with the Anti-American trash on
this group.
I heard that Bin Laden thinks that >Saddam sucks you know.. and.. and
since you also think Saddam sucks - >well, jeeeez! What other possible
conclusion can be made here!?
You are so stupid that it's not even funny anymore.
Congratulations you terrorist supporting >***** ***** anti-American
lying filthy scum of the earth Bin Laden >loving loser.
Dani
No dear, it is you and your buddies on this group that support Saddam Hussein
adn who are in comeplete agreement with him politcally against President Bush.
The only people who are *not* politically against President Bush are his rich
cronies that are making lots and lots of money off his illegal war, and the
unintelligent. Since you have repeatedly stated that Saddam is very
intelligent, and we all know that he's certainly not getting any money from this
war, of course he will be in agreement with everyone else!!
Woods
.
|
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: Yet more lies from Dani |
11 Jul 2004 10:20:40 AM |
|
|
woodswun@tepidmail.com
wrote:
tonyz2001@aol.com (TonyZ2001) wrote:
Dani
wrote:
tonyz2001@aol.com (TonyZ2001) wrote:
Marvin The Paranoid Android >marv@galaxy.com
wrote:
I've stated Bush was an ***** months ago ... what's your point? Saddam
supports me?
Nope, that you and your ilk are of the >>same mind of Saddam Hussein.
Congratulations.
You do know that you're on my list of >people who support Al-Queda,
don't you, Tony? Well, son, I regret having to have put you there,
but you're now there and you won't be >coming off any time soon.
I see that you have decided to dig in deeper with the Anti-American trash on
this group.
I heard that Bin Laden thinks that >Saddam sucks you know.. and.. and
since you also think Saddam sucks - >well, jeeeez! What other possible
conclusion can be made here!?
You are so stupid that it's not even funny anymore.
Congratulations you terrorist supporting >***** ***** anti-American
lying filthy scum of the earth Bin Laden >loving loser.
Dani
No dear, it is you and your buddies on this group that support Saddam
Hussein
adn who are in comeplete agreement with him politcally against President
Bush.
The only people who are *not* politically >against President Bush are his rich
cronies that are making lots and lots of >money off his illegal war, and the
unintelligent.
Woods
You are a Moron, President Bush is going to get reelected this November in
rather easy fashion, proving you and the rest of the Liberals wrong.
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: Yet more lies from Dani |
11 Jul 2004 10:46:46 AM |
|
|
In article <20040711112040.11381.00000872@mb-m23.aol.com>, (TonyZ2001) wrote:
woodswun@tepidmail.com
wrote:
(TonyZ2001) wrote:
Dani
wrote:
(TonyZ2001) wrote:
Marvin The Paranoid Android >marv@galaxy.com
wrote:
I've stated Bush was an ***** months ago ... what's your point? Saddam
supports me?
Nope, that you and your ilk are of the >>same mind of Saddam Hussein.
Congratulations.
You do know that you're on my list of >people who support Al-Queda,
don't you, Tony? Well, son, I regret having to have put you there,
but you're now there and you won't be >coming off any time soon.
I see that you have decided to dig in deeper with the Anti-American trash on
this group.
I heard that Bin Laden thinks that >Saddam sucks you know.. and.. and
since you also think Saddam sucks - >well, jeeeez! What other possible
conclusion can be made here!?
You are so stupid that it's not even funny anymore.
Congratulations you terrorist supporting >***** ***** anti-American
lying filthy scum of the earth Bin Laden >loving loser.
Dani
No dear, it is you and your buddies on this group that support Saddam
Hussein
adn who are in comeplete agreement with him politcally against President
Bush.
The only people who are *not* politically >against President Bush are his rich
cronies that are making lots and lots of >money off his illegal war, and the
unintelligent.
Woods
You are a Moron, President Bush is going to get reelected this November in
rather easy fashion, proving you and the rest of the Liberals wrong.
In that case, we'll have to suffice ourselves with knowing that President
Hillary Clinton will be in office for 2009-2017. The only way she'll be able to
get into the White House (again) is if Bush wins this year. How delightfully
ironic!
Woods
.
|
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: Yet more lies from Dani |
13 Jul 2004 11:17:51 AM |
|
|
woodswun@tepidmail.com
wrote:
tonyz2001@aol.com (TonyZ2001) wrote:
woodswun@tepidmail.com
wrote:
tonyz2001@aol.com (TonyZ2001) wrote:
Dani
wrote:
tonyz2001@aol.com (TonyZ2001) wrote:
Marvin The Paranoid Android >marv@galaxy.com
wrote:
I've stated Bush was an ***** months ago ... what's your point?
Saddam
supports me?
Nope, that you and your ilk are of the >>same mind of Saddam Hussein.
Congratulations.
You do know that you're on my list of >people who support Al-Queda,
don't you, Tony? Well, son, I regret having to have put you there,
but you're now there and you won't be >coming off any time soon.
I see that you have decided to dig in deeper with the Anti-American trash
on
this group.
I heard that Bin Laden thinks that >Saddam sucks you know.. and.. and
since you also think Saddam sucks - >well, jeeeez! What other possible
conclusion can be made here!?
You are so stupid that it's not even funny anymore.
Congratulations you terrorist supporting >***** ***** anti-American
lying filthy scum of the earth Bin Laden >loving loser.
Dani
No dear, it is you and your buddies on this group that support Saddam
Hussein
adn who are in comeplete agreement with him politcally against President
Bush.
The only people who are *not* politically >against President Bush are his
rich
cronies that are making lots and lots of >money off his illegal war, and
the
unintelligent.
Woods
You are a Moron, President Bush is going to get reelected this November in
rather easy fashion, proving you and the rest of the Liberals wrong.
In that case, we'll have to suffice >ourselves with knowing that President
Hillary Clinton will be in office for >2009-2017. The only way she'll be able
to get into the White House (again) is if >Bush wins this year. How
delightfully
ironic.
So the truth comes out, like most Liberals you just can't wait to annoint her
"Queen".
If she ever gets control of this country, then you will see what happens when a
meglomaniac is in the White House.
P.S. Don't look her in the eye.
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: Yet more lies from Dani |
13 Jul 2004 06:01:25 PM |
|
|
In article <20040713121751.05775.00001648@mb-m05.aol.com>, (TonyZ2001) wrote:
woodswun@tepidmail.com
wrote:
(TonyZ2001) wrote:
woodswun@tepidmail.com
wrote:
(TonyZ2001) wrote:
Dani
wrote:
(TonyZ2001) wrote:
Marvin The Paranoid Android >marv@galaxy.com
wrote:
I've stated Bush was an ***** months ago ... what's your point?
Saddam
supports me?
Nope, that you and your ilk are of the >>same mind of Saddam Hussein.
Congratulations.
You do know that you're on my list of >people who support Al-Queda,
don't you, Tony? Well, son, I regret having to have put you there,
but you're now there and you won't be >coming off any time soon.
I see that you have decided to dig in deeper with the Anti-American trash
on
this group.
I heard that Bin Laden thinks that >Saddam sucks you know.. and.. and
since you also think Saddam sucks - >well, jeeeez! What other possible
conclusion can be made here!?
You are so stupid that it's not even funny anymore.
Congratulations you terrorist supporting >***** ***** anti-American
lying filthy scum of the earth Bin Laden >loving loser.
Dani
No dear, it is you and your buddies on this group that support Saddam
Hussein
adn who are in comeplete agreement with him politcally against President
Bush.
The only people who are *not* politically >against President Bush are his
rich
cronies that are making lots and lots of >money off his illegal war, and
the
unintelligent.
Woods
You are a Moron, President Bush is going to get reelected this November in
rather easy fashion, proving you and the rest of the Liberals wrong.
In that case, we'll have to suffice >ourselves with knowing that President
Hillary Clinton will be in office for >2009-2017. The only way she'll be able
to get into the White House (again) is if >Bush wins this year. How
delightfully
ironic.
So the truth comes out, like most Liberals you just can't wait to annoint her
"Queen".
Well, she's done okay by New York, but mostly I find it hilarious that the rabid
Bush supporters are helping Hillary get into the White House the next election.
If she ever gets control of this country, then you will see what happens when a
meglomaniac is in the White House.
P.S. Don't look her in the eye.
Well, like I said, she's done very well for New York. She has actually been
taking the time to learn the issues, travels around the state to meet with
people and knows the issues beforehand - and I'm talking about issues on
current research projects, agricultural projects, and the like, not politics.
She really does her homework! (I'm quite stunned actually).
Woods
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Johnathan McDonald" |
|
| Title: Re: Yet more lies from Dani |
13 Jul 2004 09:29:25 PM |
|
|
(Woodswun) wrote in message news:<9RZIc.44362$yd5.26808@twister.nyroc.rr.com>...
If she ever gets control of this country, then you will see what happens when a
meglomaniac is in the White House.
P.S. Don't look her in the eye.
Well, like I said, she's done very well for New York. She has actually been
taking the time to learn the issues, travels around the state to meet with
people and knows the issues beforehand - and I'm talking about issues on
current research projects, agricultural projects, and the like, not politics.
She really does her homework! (I'm quite stunned actually).
Woods did you know after the Senate intelligence report ( CIA and
Bush's decisions on war) came out this week Hillary said she still
backs Bush's War on Terror and the Current Iraq War? ;) I know you are
against the War in Iraq and you said "She really does her homework!" &
"I'm quite stunned actually."
I guess you have honesty problems.
Woods
BTW Clinton did loose his Bar license for a time so he was convicted
in court as a criminal because of his perjury. I guess for you DUI is
more heinous crime than lying under oath which hurt people and the
cost of $80 million dollars of wasted time when the former pres. could
have been focusing on Al ‘ Qaeda by telling the truth from the
beginning in Jan 1998.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jean Guernon" |
|
| Title: Re: Yet more lies from Dani |
11 Jul 2004 02:37:01 AM |
|
|
Woodswun a écrit:
In article <20040710121924.19227.00001729@mb-m06.aol.com>, (TonyZ2001) wrote:
Dani
wrote:
(TonyZ2001) wrote:
Marvin The Paranoid Android >marv@galaxy.com
wrote:
I've stated Bush was an ***** months ago ... what's your point? Saddam
supports me?
Nope, that you and your ilk are of the >>same mind of Saddam Hussein.
Congratulations.
You do know that you're on my list of >people who support Al-Queda,
don't you, Tony? Well, son, I regret having to have put you there,
but you're now there and you won't be >coming off any time soon.
I see that you have decided to dig in deeper with the Anti-American trash on
this group.
I heard that Bin Laden thinks that >Saddam sucks you know.. and.. and
since you also think Saddam sucks - >well, jeeeez! What other possible
conclusion can be made here!?
You are so stupid that it's not even funny anymore.
Congratulations you terrorist supporting >***** ***** anti-American
lying filthy scum of the earth Bin Laden >loving loser.
Dani
No dear, it is you and your buddies on this group that support Saddam Hussein
adn who are in comeplete agreement with him politcally against President Bush.
The only people who are *not* politically against President Bush are his rich
cronies that are making lots and lots of money off his illegal war, and the
unintelligent.
The most stupid statement of the year.
Bravo Woods. Atr least you are the most something.
J.
.
|
|
|
| User: "R. Foreman" |
|
| Title: Re: Yet more lies from Dani |
11 Jul 2004 10:04:50 AM |
|
|
Jean Guernon <jguernon@globetrotter.net> Spat the Words
Woodswun a écrit:
In article <20040710121924.19227.00001729@mb-m06.aol.com>,
tonyz2001@aol.com (TonyZ2001) wrote:
Dani
wrote:
tonyz2001@aol.com (TonyZ2001) wrote:
Marvin The Paranoid Android >marv@galaxy.com
wrote:
I've stated Bush was an ***** months ago ... what's your point?
Saddam supports me?
Nope, that you and your ilk are of the >>same mind of Saddam
Hussein.
Congratulations.
You do know that you're on my list of >people who support Al-Queda,
don't you, Tony? Well, son, I regret having to have put you there,
but you're now there and you won't be >coming off any time soon.
I see that you have decided to dig in deeper with the Anti-American
trash on this group.
I heard that Bin Laden thinks that >Saddam sucks you know.. and..
and since you also think Saddam sucks - >well, jeeeez! What other
possible conclusion can be made here!?
You are so stupid that it's not even funny anymore.
Congratulations you terrorist supporting >***** *****
anti-American lying filthy scum of the earth Bin Laden >loving
loser.
Dani
No dear, it is you and your buddies on this group that support Saddam
Hussein adn who are in comeplete agreement with him politcally
against President Bush.
The only people who are *not* politically against President Bush are
his rich cronies that are making lots and lots of money off his
illegal war, and the unintelligent.
Also not against Bush are the foreign parasites who wish
Bush to spend American dollars and American lives to protect
them from the bad guys.
The most stupid statement of the year.
Bravo Woods. Atr least you are the most something.
J.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jean Guernon" |
|
| Title: Re: Yet more lies from Dani |
11 Jul 2004 12:43:53 PM |
|
|
R. Foreman a écrit:
Jean Guernon <jguernon@globetrotter.net> Spat the Words
Woodswun a écrit:
In article <20040710121924.19227.00001729@mb-m06.aol.com>,
tonyz2001@aol.com (TonyZ2001) wrote:
Dani
wrote:
tonyz2001@aol.com (TonyZ2001) wrote:
Marvin The Paranoid Android >marv@galaxy.com
wrote:
I've stated Bush was an ***** months ago ... what's your point?
Saddam supports me?
Nope, that you and your ilk are of the >>same mind of Saddam
Hussein.
Congratulations.
You do know that you're on my list of >people who support Al-Queda,
don't you, Tony? Well, son, I regret having to have put you there,
but you're now there and you won't be >coming off any time soon.
I see that you have decided to dig in deeper with the Anti-American
trash on this group.
I heard that Bin Laden thinks that >Saddam sucks you know.. and..
and since you also think Saddam sucks - >well, jeeeez! What other
possible conclusion can be made here!?
You are so stupid that it's not even funny anymore.
Congratulations you terrorist supporting >***** *****
anti-American lying filthy scum of the earth Bin Laden >loving
loser.
Dani
No dear, it is you and your buddies on this group that support Saddam
Hussein adn who are in comeplete agreement with him politcally
against President Bush.
The only people who are *not* politically against President Bush are
his rich cronies that are making lots and lots of money off his
illegal war, and the unintelligent.
Also not against Bush are the foreign parasites who wish
Bush to spend American dollars and American lives to protect
them from the bad guys.
Anti-US rhetorics from you is a fait accompli. You can kiss my *****. But
I notice that you too think that half the electorate is either
millionaire or stupid. Which shows how you (too) view success. Imbeciles.
J.
The most stupid statement of the year.
Bravo Woods. Atr least you are the most something.
J.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: Yet more lies from Dani |
12 Jul 2004 05:54:30 PM |
|
|
In article <Y_eIc.19425328$Id.3209655@news.easynews.com>, Jean Guernon <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote:
R. Foreman a écrit:
Jean Guernon <jguernon@globetrotter.net> Spat the Words
Woodswun a écrit:
In article <20040710121924.19227.00001729@mb-m06.aol.com>,
tonyz2001@aol.com (TonyZ2001) wrote:
Dani
wrote:
tonyz2001@aol.com (TonyZ2001) wrote:
Marvin The Paranoid Android >marv@galaxy.com
wrote:
I've stated Bush was an ***** months ago ... what's your point?
Saddam supports me?
Nope, that you and your ilk are of the >>same mind of Saddam
Hussein.
Congratulations.
You do know that you're on my list of >people who support Al-Queda,
don't you, Tony? Well, son, I regret having to have put you there,
but you're now there and you won't be >coming off any time soon.
I see that you have decided to dig in deeper with the Anti-American
trash on this group.
I heard that Bin Laden thinks that >Saddam sucks you know.. and..
and since you also think Saddam sucks - >well, jeeeez! What other
possible conclusion can be made here!?
You are so stupid that it's not even funny anymore.
Congratulations you terrorist supporting >***** *****
anti-American lying filthy scum of the earth Bin Laden >loving
loser.
Dani
No dear, it is you and your buddies on this group that support Saddam
Hussein adn who are in comeplete agreement with him politcally
against President Bush.
The only people who are *not* politically against President Bush are
his rich cronies that are making lots and lots of money off his
illegal war, and the unintelligent.
Also not against Bush are the foreign parasites who wish
Bush to spend American dollars and American lives to protect
them from the bad guys.
Anti-US rhetorics from you is a fait accompli. You can kiss my *****. But
I notice that you too think that half the electorate is either
millionaire or stupid. Which shows how you (too) view success. Imbeciles.
Um .... by definition, half of the population is below the 50th percentile on
the IQ scale - ergo, half the population is "stupid". If you add to that the
millionaires, that would likely be slightly more than half.
Woods
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "R. Foreman" |
|
| Title: Re: Yet more lies from Dani |
11 Jul 2004 04:04:15 PM |
|
|
Jean Guernon <jguernon@globetrotter.net> Spat the Words
R. Foreman a écrit:
Jean Guernon <jguernon@globetrotter.net> Spat the Words
Woodswun a écrit:
The only people who are *not* politically against President Bush are
his rich cronies that are making lots and lots of money off his
illegal war, and the unintelligent.
Also not against Bush are the foreign parasites who wish
Bush to spend American dollars and American lives to protect
them from the bad guys.
Anti-US rhetorics from you is a fait accompli. You can kiss my *****.
Thank you, I'd rather not.
But
I notice that you too think that half the electorate is either
No, it's more like 80% - 20%
And how is it you're fixated on American elections - you being
a canook and all?
millionaire or stupid. Which shows how you (too) view success.
Imbeciles.
J.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jean Guernon" |
|
| Title: Re: Yet more lies from Dani |
11 Jul 2004 05:04:09 PM |
|
|
R. Foreman a écrit:
Jean Guernon <jguernon@globetrotter.net> Spat the Words
R. Foreman a écrit:
Jean Guernon <jguernon@globetrotter.net> Spat the Words
Woodswun a écrit:
The only people who are *not* politically against President Bush are
his rich cronies that are making lots and lots of money off his
illegal war, and the unintelligent.
Also not against Bush are the foreign parasites who wish
Bush to spend American dollars and American lives to protect
them from the bad guys.
Anti-US rhetorics from you is a fait accompli. You can kiss my *****.
Thank you, I'd rather not.
But
I notice that you too think that half the electorate is either
No, it's more like 80% - 20%
Another lie.
And how is it you're fixated on American elections - you being
a canook and all?
I hate lies on my NG.
J.
millionaire or stupid. Which shows how you (too) view success.
Imbeciles.
J.
.
|
|
|
| User: "tw" |
|
| Title: Re: Yet more lies from Dani |
12 Jul 2004 04:28:49 AM |
|
|
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:tPiIc.517917$ef4.60608@news.easynews.com...
R. Foreman a écrit:
Jean Guernon <jguernon@globetrotter.net> Spat the Words
R. Foreman a écrit:
Jean Guernon <jguernon@globetrotter.net> Spat the Words
Woodswun a écrit:
The only people who are *not* politically against President Bush are
his rich cronies that are making lots and lots of money off his
illegal war, and the unintelligent.
Also not against Bush are the foreign parasites who wish
Bush to spend American dollars and American lives to protect
them from the bad guys.
Anti-US rhetorics from you is a fait accompli. You can kiss my *****.
Thank you, I'd rather not.
But
I notice that you too think that half the electorate is either
No, it's more like 80% - 20%
Another lie.
And how is it you're fixated on American elections - you being
a canook and all?
I hate lies on my NG.
So why do you tell so many Jean? Foudn any anti-semitic posts from me yet?
Of course not, in your mind anti-semitism merely means someone who disagrees
with you, or you use it as a tool to stir up hatred against Jews.
Still trying to deny you say you "served by not serving"? And Why do you
believe the Germans were justified in supporting Hitler in the thirties,
seeing as :
"the political part is one thing,
the patriotic part is completely another. Once the chips are down, you
have to support your country."
You lying old anti-semite nazi drunkard?
LOL
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jean Guernon" |
|
| Title: Re: Yet more lies from Dani |
12 Jul 2004 04:09:03 PM |
|
|
tw a écrit:
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:tPiIc.517917$ef4.60608@news.easynews.com...
R. Foreman a écrit:
Jean Guernon <jguernon@globetrotter.net> Spat the Words
R. Foreman a écrit:
Jean Guernon <jguernon@globetrotter.net> Spat the Words
Woodswun a écrit:
The only people who are *not* politically against President Bush are
his rich cronies that are making lots and lots of money off his
illegal war, and the unintelligent.
Also not against Bush are the foreign parasites who wish
Bush to spend American dollars and American lives to protect
them from the bad guys.
Anti-US rhetorics from you is a fait accompli. You can kiss my *****.
Thank you, I'd rather not.
But
I notice that you too think that half the electorate is either
No, it's more like 80% - 20%
Another lie.
And how is it you're fixated on American elections - you being
a canook and all?
I hate lies on my NG.
So why do you tell so many Jean? Foudn any anti-semitic posts from me yet?
YES!
J.
.
|
|
|
| User: "tw" |
|
| Title: Re: Yet more lies from Dani |
13 Jul 2004 01:28:58 AM |
|
|
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:P5DIc.19609887$Of.3253582@news.easynews.com...
tw a écrit:
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:tPiIc.517917$ef4.60608@news.easynews.com...
R. Foreman a écrit:
Jean Guernon <jguernon@globetrotter.net> Spat the Words
R. Foreman a écrit:
Jean Guernon <jguernon@globetrotter.net> Spat the Words
Woodswun a écrit:
The only people who are *not* politically against President Bush
are
his rich cronies that are making lots and lots of money off his
illegal war, and the unintelligent.
Also not against Bush are the foreign parasites who wish
Bush to spend American dollars and American lives to protect
them from the bad guys.
Anti-US rhetorics from you is a fait accompli. You can kiss my *****.
Thank you, I'd rather not.
But
I notice that you too think that half the electorate is either
No, it's more like 80% - 20%
Another lie.
And how is it you're fixated on American elections - you being
a canook and all?
I hate lies on my NG.
So why do you tell so many Jean? Foudn any anti-semitic posts from me
yet?
YES!
In your dreams, anti-semite loser. So where are they?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jean Guernon" |
|
| Title: Re: Yet more lies from Dani |
14 Jul 2004 01:16:14 PM |
|
|
tw a écrit:
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:P5DIc.19609887$Of.3253582@news.easynews.com...
tw a écrit:
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:tPiIc.517917$ef4.60608@news.easynews.com...
R. Foreman a écrit:
Jean Guernon <jguernon@globetrotter.net> Spat the Words
R. Foreman a écrit:
Jean Guernon <jguernon@globetrotter.net> Spat the Words
Woodswun a écrit:
The only people who are *not* politically against President Bush
are
his rich cronies that are making lots and lots of money off his
illegal war, and the unintelligent.
Also not against Bush are the foreign parasites who wish
Bush to spend American dollars and American lives to protect
them from the bad guys.
Anti-US rhetorics from you is a fait accompli. You can kiss my *****.
Thank you, I'd rather not.
But
I notice that you too think that half the electorate is either
No, it's more like 80% - 20%
Another lie.
And how is it you're fixated on American elections - you being
a canook and all?
I hate lies on my NG.
So why do you tell so many Jean? Foudn any anti-semitic posts from me
yet?
YES!
In your dreams, anti-semite loser. So where are they?
Yap yap again tw?
J.
.
|
|
|
| User: "tw" |
|
| Title: Re: Yet more lies from Dani |
15 Jul 2004 02:26:29 AM |
|
|
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:NLeJc.19756445$Of.3283365@news.easynews.com...
tw a écrit:
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:P5DIc.19609887$Of.3253582@news.easynews.com...
tw a écrit:
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:tPiIc.517917$ef4.60608@news.easynews.com...
R. Foreman a écrit:
Jean Guernon <jguernon@globetrotter.net> Spat the Words
R. Foreman a écrit:
Jean Guernon <jguernon@globetrotter.net> Spat the Words
Woodswun a écrit:
The only people who are *not* politically against President Bush
are
his rich cronies that are making lots and lots of money off his
illegal war, and the unintelligent.
Also not against Bush are the foreign parasites who wish
Bush to spend American dollars and American lives to protect
them from the bad guys.
Anti-US rhetorics from you is a fait accompli. You can kiss my *****.
Thank you, I'd rather not.
But
I notice that you too think that half the electorate is either
No, it's more like 80% - 20%
Another lie.
And how is it you're fixated on American elections - you being
a canook and all?
I hate lies on my NG.
So why do you tell so many Jean? Foudn any anti-semitic posts from me
yet?
YES!
In your dreams, anti-semite loser. So where are they?
Yap yap again tw?
Why aren't you man enough to apologise when you've been proven WRONG Jeanne?
LOL
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jean Guernon" |
|
| Title: Re: Yet more lies from Dani |
15 Jul 2004 11:34:40 AM |
|
|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------040009070905000104050300
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
tw a écrit:
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:NLeJc.19756445$Of.3283365@news.easynews.com...
tw a écrit:
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:P5DIc.19609887$Of.3253582@news.easynews.com...
tw a écrit:
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:tPiIc.517917$ef4.60608@news.easynews.com...
R. Foreman a écrit:
Jean Guernon <jguernon@globetrotter.net> Spat the Words
R. Foreman a écrit:
Jean Guernon <jguernon@globetrotter.net> Spat the Words
Woodswun a écrit:
The only people who are *not* politically against President Bush
are
his rich cronies that are making lots and lots of money off his
illegal war, and the unintelligent.
Also not against Bush are the foreign parasites who wish
Bush to spend American dollars and American lives to protect
them from the bad guys.
Anti-US rhetorics from you is a fait accompli. You can kiss my *****.
Thank you, I'd rather not.
But
I notice that you too think that half the electorate is either
No, it's more like 80% - 20%
Another lie.
And how is it you're fixated on American elections - you being
a canook and all?
I hate lies on my NG.
So why do you tell so many Jean? Foudn any anti-semitic posts from me
yet?
YES!
In your dreams, anti-semite loser. So where are they?
Yap yap again tw?
Why aren't you man enough to apologise when you've been proven WRONG Jeanne?
LOL
Your latest snti-semite statement will never be considered otherwise.
You are the one debunked to the bone who has to leave lest you look like
the liar you are.
J.
--------------040009070905000104050300
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1">
<title></title>
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
<br>
<br>
tw a écrit:<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="midcd5bf0$s74$1@newstree.wise.edt.ericsson.se">
<pre wrap="">"Jean Guernon" <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:jguernon@globetrotter.net"><jguernon@globetrotter.net></a> wrote in message
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="news:NLeJc.19756445$Of.3283365@news.easynews.com">news:NLeJc.19756445$Of.3283365@news.easynews.com</a>...
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">
tw a écrit:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">"Jean Guernon" <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:jguernon@globetrotter.net"><jguernon@globetrotter.net></a> wrote in message
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="news:P5DIc.19609887$Of.3253582@news.easynews.com">news:P5DIc.19609887$Of.3253582@news.easynews.com</a>...
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">tw a écrit:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">"Jean Guernon" <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:jguernon@globetrotter.net"><jguernon@globetrotter.net></a> wrote in message
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="news:tPiIc.517917$ef4.60608@news.easynews.com">news:tPiIc.517917$ef4.60608@news.easynews.com</a>...
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">R. Foreman a écrit:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Jean Guernon <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:jguernon@globetrotter.net"><jguernon@globetrotter.net></a> Spat the Words
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">R. Foreman a écrit:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Jean Guernon <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:jguernon@globetrotter.net"><jguernon@globetrotter.net></a> Spat the Words
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Woodswun a écrit:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">The only people who are *not* politically against President Bush
</pre>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">are
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">his rich cronies that are making lots and lots of money off his
illegal war, and the unintelligent.
</pre>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
Also not against Bush are the foreign parasites who wish
Bush to spend American dollars and American lives to protect
them from the bad guys.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
Anti-US rhetorics from you is a fait accompli. You can kiss my *****.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
Thank you, I'd rather not.
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">But
I notice that you too think that half the electorate is either
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
No, it's more like 80% - 20%
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">Another lie.
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">And how is it you're fixated on American elections - you being
a canook and all?
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">I hate lies on my NG.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
So why do you tell so many Jean? Foudn any anti-semitic posts from me
</pre>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">yet?
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">YES!
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
In your dreams, anti-semite loser. So where are they?
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">Yap yap again tw?
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
Why aren't you man enough to apologise when you've been proven WRONG Jeanne?
LOL</pre>
</blockquote>
Your latest snti-semite statement will never be considered otherwise.
You are the one debunked to the bone who has to leave lest you look
like the liar you are.<br>
<br>
J.<br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="midcd5bf0$s74$1@newstree.wise.edt.ericsson.se">
<pre wrap="">
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>
--------------040009070905000104050300--
.
|
|
|
| User: "tw" |
|
| Title: Re: Yet more lies from Dani |
16 Jul 2004 03:01:21 AM |
|
|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0021_01C46B1B.D8CD03A0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
"Jean Guernon" <jeanguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message =
news:AmyJc.802944$ef4.99319@news.easynews.com...
tw a =E9crit:
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:NLeJc.19756445$Of.3283365@news.easynews.com...
tw a =E9crit:
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:P5DIc.19609887$Of.3253582@news.easynews.com...
tw a =E9crit:
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:tPiIc.517917$ef4.60608@news.easynews.com...
R. Foreman a =E9crit:
Jean Guernon <jguernon@globetrotter.net> Spat the Words
R. Foreman a =E9crit:
Jean Guernon <jguernon@globetrotter.net> Spat the Words
Woodswun a =E9crit:
The only people who are *not* politically against =
President Bush
are
his rich cronies that are making lots and lots of money off his
illegal war, and the unintelligent.
Also not against Bush are the foreign parasites =
who wish
Bush to spend American dollars and American lives to protect
them from the bad guys.
Anti-US rhetorics from you is a fait accompli. You can =
kiss my *****.
Thank you, I'd rather not.
But
I notice that you too think that half the electorate is either
No, it's more like 80% - 20%
Another lie.
And how is it you're fixated on American elections - you =
being
a canook and all?
I hate lies on my NG.
So why do you tell so many Jean? Foudn any anti-semitic =
posts from me
yet?
YES!
In your dreams, anti-semite loser. So where are they?
Yap yap again tw?
=20
Why aren't you man enough to apologise when you've been proven WRONG =
Jeanne?
LOLYour latest snti-semite statement will never be considered otherwise. =
You are the one debunked to the bone who has to leave lest you look like =
the liar you are.
No Jean. The deal was if Woods found it anti-semitic I would leave. If =
she didn't, you would have to apologise and I woudl leave. How =
surprising that you didn't keep you word, liar.
------=_NextPart_000_0021_01C46B1B.D8CD03A0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD><TITLE></TITLE>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type =
content=3Dtext/html;charset=3DISO-8859-1>
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1264" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY text=3D#000000 bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>"Jean Guernon" <<A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:jeanguernon@globetrotter.net">jeanguernon@globetrotter.net=
</A>>=20
wrote in message <A=20
=
href=3D"news:AmyJc.802944$ef4.99319@news.easynews.com">news:AmyJc.802944$=
ef4.99319@news.easynews.com</A>...</DIV><BR><BR>tw=20
a =E9crit:<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE cite=3Dmidcd5bf0$s74$1@newstree.wise.edt.ericsson.se =
type=3D"cite"><PRE wrap=3D"">"Jean Guernon" <A =
class=3Dmoz-txt-link-rfc2396E =
href=3D"mailto:jguernon@globetrotter.net"><jguernon@globetrotter.net&g=
t;</A> wrote in message
<A class=3Dmoz-txt-link-freetext =
href=3D"news:NLeJc.19756445$Of.3283365@news.easynews.com">news:NLeJc.1975=
6445$Of.3283365@news.easynews.com</A>...
</PRE>
<BLOCKQUOTE type=3D"cite"><PRE wrap=3D"">tw a =E9crit:
</PRE>
<BLOCKQUOTE type=3D"cite"><PRE wrap=3D"">"Jean Guernon" <A =
class=3Dmoz-txt-link-rfc2396E =
href=3D"mailto:jguernon@globetrotter.net"><jguernon@globetrotter.net&g=
t;</A> wrote in message
<A class=3Dmoz-txt-link-freetext =
href=3D"news:P5DIc.19609887$Of.3253582@news.easynews.com">news:P5DIc.1960=
9887$Of.3253582@news.easynews.com</A>...
</PRE>
<BLOCKQUOTE type=3D"cite"><PRE wrap=3D"">tw a =E9crit:
</PRE>
<BLOCKQUOTE type=3D"cite"><PRE wrap=3D"">"Jean Guernon" <A =
class=3Dmoz-txt-link-rfc2396E =
href=3D"mailto:jguernon@globetrotter.net"><jguernon@globetrotter.net&g=
t;</A> wrote in message
<A class=3Dmoz-txt-link-freetext =
href=3D"news:tPiIc.517917$ef4.60608@news.easynews.com">news:tPiIc.517917$=
ef4.60608@news.easynews.com</A>...
</PRE>
<BLOCKQUOTE type=3D"cite"><PRE wrap=3D"">R. Foreman a =
=E9crit:
</PRE>
<BLOCKQUOTE type=3D"cite"><PRE wrap=3D"">Jean Guernon <A =
class=3Dmoz-txt-link-rfc2396E =
href=3D"mailto:jguernon@globetrotter.net"><jguernon@globetrotter.net&g=
t;</A> Spat the Words
</PRE>
<BLOCKQUOTE type=3D"cite"><PRE wrap=3D"">R. Foreman a =
=E9crit:
</PRE>
<BLOCKQUOTE type=3D"cite"><PRE wrap=3D"">Jean Guernon =
<A class=3Dmoz-txt-link-rfc2396E =
href=3D"mailto:jguernon@globetrotter.net"><jguernon@globetrotter.net&g=
t;</A> Spat the Words
</PRE>
<BLOCKQUOTE type=3D"cite"><PRE wrap=3D"">Woodswun a =
=E9crit:
</PRE>
<BLOCKQUOTE type=3D"cite"><PRE wrap=3D"">The only =
people who are *not* politically against President Bush
=
</PRE></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></=
BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE><PRE wrap=3D"">are
</PRE>
<BLOCKQUOTE type=3D"cite">
<BLOCKQUOTE type=3D"cite">
<BLOCKQUOTE type=3D"cite">
<BLOCKQUOTE type=3D"cite">
<BLOCKQUOTE type=3D"cite">
<BLOCKQUOTE type=3D"cite">
<BLOCKQUOTE type=3D"cite">
<BLOCKQUOTE type=3D"cite"><PRE wrap=3D"">his rich =
cronies that are making lots and lots of money off his
illegal war, and the unintelligent.
</PRE></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE><PRE =
wrap=3D"">Also not against Bush are the foreign parasites who wish
Bush to spend American dollars and American lives to protect
them from the bad guys.
</PRE></BLOCKQUOTE><PRE wrap=3D"">Anti-US rhetorics =
from you is a fait accompli. You can kiss my *****.
</PRE></BLOCKQUOTE><PRE wrap=3D"">Thank you, I'd rather =
not.
</PRE>
<BLOCKQUOTE type=3D"cite"><PRE wrap=3D"">But
I notice that you too think that half the electorate is either
</PRE></BLOCKQUOTE><PRE wrap=3D"">No, it's more like 80% =
- 20%
</PRE></BLOCKQUOTE><PRE wrap=3D"">Another lie.
</PRE>
<BLOCKQUOTE type=3D"cite"><PRE wrap=3D"">And how is it =
you're fixated on American elections - you being
a canook and all?
</PRE></BLOCKQUOTE><PRE wrap=3D"">I hate lies on my NG.
</PRE></BLOCKQUOTE><PRE wrap=3D"">So why do you tell so many =
Jean? Foudn any anti-semitic posts from me
</PRE></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE><PRE wrap=3D"">yet?
</PRE>
<BLOCKQUOTE type=3D"cite"><PRE wrap=3D"">YES!
</PRE></BLOCKQUOTE><PRE wrap=3D"">In your dreams, anti-semite =
loser. So where are they?
</PRE></BLOCKQUOTE><PRE wrap=3D"">Yap yap again tw?
</PRE></BLOCKQUOTE><PRE wrap=3D""><!---->
Why aren't you man enough to apologise when you've been proven WRONG =
Jeanne?
LOL</PRE></BLOCKQUOTE>
<DIV>Your latest snti-semite statement will never be considered =
otherwise. You=20
are the one debunked to the bone who has to leave lest you look like =
the liar=20
you are.<BR></DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>No Jean. The deal was if Woods found it =
anti-semitic I would=20
leave. If she didn't, you would have to apologise and I woudl leave. =
How=20
surprising that you didn't keep you word, liar.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT><BR><BR> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE cite=3Dmidcd5bf0$s74$1@newstree.wise.edt.ericsson.se =
type=3D"cite"><PRE wrap=3D"">
</PRE></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_0021_01C46B1B.D8CD03A0--
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Yet more lies from Dani |
12 Jul 2004 06:52:14 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 22:04:09 GMT, Jean Guernon
<jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote:
I hate lies on my NG.
J.
Hahahahahahahahahahahhaha, the FROG hates "lies" on "his" newsgroup.
Hahahahahahahah an egotist as well as a liar, man you are one fucked
up furrball there Guernon.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "bollogs" |
|
| Title: Re: Yet more lies from Dani |
11 Jul 2004 11:50:49 AM |
|
|
Jean Guernon <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message news:<x66Ic.19398107$Id.3202869@news.easynews.com>...
Woodswun a écrit:
In article <20040710121924.19227.00001729@mb-m06.aol.com>, (TonyZ2001) wrote:
Dani
wrote:
(TonyZ2001) wrote:
Marvin The Paranoid Android >marv@galaxy.com
wrote:
I've stated Bush was an ***** months ago ... what's your point? Saddam
supports me?
Nope, that you and your ilk are of the >>same mind of Saddam Hussein.
Congratulations.
You do know that you're on my list of >people who support Al-Queda,
don't you, Tony? Well, son, I regret having to have put you there,
but you're now there and you won't be >coming off any time soon.
I see that you have decided to dig in deeper with the Anti-American trash on
this group.
I heard that Bin Laden thinks that >Saddam sucks you know.. and.. and
since you also think Saddam sucks - >well, jeeeez! What other possible
conclusion can be made here!?
You are so stupid that it's not even funny anymore.
Congratulations you terrorist supporting >***** ***** anti-American
lying filthy scum of the earth Bin Laden >loving loser.
Dani
No dear, it is you and your buddies on this group that support Saddam Hussein
adn who are in comeplete agreement with him politcally against President Bush.
The only people who are *not* politically against President Bush are his rich
cronies that are making lots and lots of money off his illegal war, and the
unintelligent.
The most stupid statement of the year.
Bravo Woods. Atr least you are the most something.
J.
Says the fuckin' idiot who said this:
"Bravo Woods. Atr least you are the most something."
What ín the world does that mean furball?
WH
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jean Guernon" |
|
| Title: Re: Yet more lies from Dani |
11 Jul 2004 02:06:54 PM |
|
|
bollogs a écrit:
Jean Guernon <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message news:<x66Ic.19398107$Id.3202869@news.easynews.com>...
Woodswun a écrit:
In article <20040710121924.19227.00001729@mb-m06.aol.com>, (TonyZ2001) wrote:
Dani
wrote:
(TonyZ2001) wrote:
Marvin The Paranoid Android >marv@galaxy.com
wrote:
I've stated Bush was an ***** months ago ... what's your point? Saddam
supports me?
Nope, that you and your ilk are of the >>same mind of Saddam Hussein.
Congratulations.
You do know that you're on my list of >people who support Al-Queda,
don't you, Tony? Well, son, I regret having to have put you there,
but you're now there and you won't be >coming off any time soon.
I see that you have decided to dig in deeper with the Anti-American trash on
this group.
I heard that Bin Laden thinks that >Saddam sucks you know.. and.. and
since you also think Saddam sucks - >well, jeeeez! What other possible
conclusion can be made here!?
You are so stupid that it's not even funny anymore.
Congratulations you terrorist supporting >***** ***** anti-American
lying filthy scum of the earth Bin Laden >loving loser.
Dani
No dear, it is you and your buddies on this group that support Saddam Hussein
adn who are in comeplete agreement with him politcally against President Bush.
The only people who are *not* politically against President Bush are his rich
cronies that are making lots and lots of money off his illegal war, and the
unintelligent.
The most stupid statement of the year.
Bravo Woods. Atr least you are the most something.
J.
Says the fuckin' idiot who said this:
"Bravo Woods. At least you are the most something."
What ín the world does that mean furball?
WH
Buy a dictionary *****.
J.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dani" |
|
| Title: Re: Yet more lies from Dani |
10 Jul 2004 05:44:20 PM |
|
|
On 10 Jul 2004 16:19:24 GMT, (TonyZ2001) wrote:
Dani
wrote:
(TonyZ2001) wrote:
Marvin The Paranoid Android >marv@galaxy.com
wrote:
I've stated Bush was an ***** months ago ... what's your point? Saddam
supports me?
Nope, that you and your ilk are of the >>same mind of Saddam Hussein.
Congratulations.
You do know that you're on my list of people who support Al-Queda,
don't you, Tony? Well, son, I regret having to have put you there,
but you're now there and you won't be coming off any time soon.
I see that you have decided to dig in deeper with the Anti-American trash on
this group.
More sarcasm and using your own game against you. Why am I not
surprised that you wouldn't see that.
I heard that Bin Laden thinks that Saddam sucks you know.. and.. and
since you also think Saddam sucks - well, jeeeez! What other possible
conclusion can be made here!?
You are so stupid that it's not even funny anymore.
More sarcasm and condescending.
Congratulations you terrorist supporting ***** ***** anti-American
lying filthy scum of the earth Bin Laden loving loser.
No dear, it is you and your buddies on this group that support Saddam Hussein
adn who are in comeplete agreement with him politcally against President Bush.
Now since Al Qeada and Saddam's supporters have joined forces in Iraq, it can
be said that you and your ilk now support both Saddam, and Bin Laden.
Keep digging Dani, you are now in so deep with the Terorrist supporters of this
group that you are beyond help.
LOL!
Dani
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
FRICK ! Yet again two more car bombings kill at least 26 in Iraq.........
Yet more on that Mentality
Yet another..
YET *ANOTHER* SHOOTING RAMPAGE IN AMERICA, PEOPLEZ -- WHEN WILL IT ALL JOLLY WELL FRICKIN' WELL END ?!??!
Are you embarassed yet? Seriously? Are you?
=?utf-8?q?Dumbo_vetoes_war_funding_bill,_but_fight_isn=E2=80=99t_over_yet,_peoplez_!?=
REe: Horrific yet Immaculate and undeniable TRUTH: about racism/dictatorship/war crimes
I Fear That All Is Not Right In The World Just Yet!!!
| Oh well, itz HOOROO yet once again to all of my favorite peoplez, Arrivederci, Aufwiedersehen, Adio, Ciao bella, catch U'z all l8ter, Cya'z !!!!!!!
has Doktor Turdi claimed a hit yet!!!
Yankie cover-up, yet again.
Yet another fabulous dinner
Re: Have you been to Romulus yet?
With No Major Holiday Disaster (Yet), The Fuckhole Media Obsesses About Bhutto
4 x 2's whinging yet again
|
|
|
