Chemtrails Coming
Out Of The Closet?
By William Thomas
8-31-5
Nearly seven years after extensive "lay downs" of lingering and
spreading white plumes were first reported smearing skies over across
North America, Europe is in an uproar and Washington could be close to
coming clean about chemtrails.
At least the Bush White house will soon have a legitimate weather
control agency to finally "launder" one of the biggest cons ever
perpetrated.
Introduced in the US Senate on March 1, 2005, Bill S517 calls for a US
"Weather Modification Advisory and Research Board" to officially
commence operations in October 2005. When passed as expected, this law
will make large-scale chemical alteration of the atmosphere legal
across a formerly free and beautiful land called America.
It's already happening. Less than two weeks before the bill was
introduced, Linda wrote from "up here in the mountains of northeast
Georgia" of the worst spray day she had ever seen. "Not one day in the
past two months have we had a blue sky with normal clouds," Linda
wrote. Even normal clouds "are 'laced' with whatever the hell is
coming out of those white planes that have no engine sounds, even when
they fly low enough to see there is no printing anywhere on the
planes."
Several years ago the US Air Force stated that it was repainting its
silver aircraft white, and retrofitting its jet tanker fleet with
"hush kits" to silence their engines.
DOING SOMETHING ABOUT THE WEATHER
Whatever fresh environmental disaster Bill S517 accomplishes, this
bill will ease the way for admission of a project suspected by many
and confirmed by air traffic controllers at America's biggest
airports. When and if the US public demands that their government "do
something" about the extreme weather pummeling their neighborhoods,
Washington will be able to officially reply, "We are."
Intended to "develop and implement a comprehensive and coordinated
national weather modification policy," the board is tasked with
coordinating state and federal weather modification efforts. It's
direct mandate is stepped-up research and development aimed at
developing experimental "models, devices, equipment, materials, and
processes" to change or control, "by artificial methods" the
development of clouds and/or precipitation in the troposphere. This
weather-forming region of the atmosphere lies between Earth's surface
and the stratosphere, starting around 35,000 feet.
The federal weather modifiers will now directly oversee the
cloud-seeding operations currently being carried out over dozens of
states to increase rain and snowfall for irrigation, electrical power
and winter recreation purposes. As droughts intensify under an
onslaught of moisture-absorbing chemicals dispensed behind
ozone-destroying jet tankers, and future towns wash away in sudden
flash floods triggered by rain-inducing atmospheric tinkering, these
unnatural disasters and other "inadvertent" effects of weather
modification will be closely "studied" by the newly created board.
But no studies have been released on the implications of wide-scale
alteration of regional atmospheric heat balances.
Large-scale weather modification is banned under the United Nations
Environmental Modification Convention signed by Washington in 1970.
CHEMTRAILS 2005
Meanwhile, recent heavy "Chemtrail" spraying over Portland, Oregon and
Canada's west coast has eased off once again. Another long-time
Chemtrail "hot zone", Santa Cruz, California continues reporting clear
blue skies unmarked by the chemplanes' ugly scrawl.
As recently as May 2005, a Swiss resident sent photographs to Meria
Heller's website, reporting: "Today was one of the heaviest Spraying
in Switzerland ever."
CHEMTRAILS CLOSE-UP
Some Canadians also have their eyes wide open. in June 2005, large
graffiti spray-painted on a major overpass in West Vancouver advised
motorists: WAKE UP, LOOK UP, CHEMTRAILS ARE EVERYWHERE.
AIR FORCE INSIDER DESCRIBES WEATHER MOD MISSIONS
An active duty air force crew chief has described environmental combat
missions already being flown by specially-outfitted C-130 Hercules
transports, which can be reloaded, refueled and relaunched in just 10
minutes to continue their assault on violent storms afflicting US
communities. Flown by regular air force pilots, these "science
flights" include onboard meteorologists, who painstakingly log the
results of each mission.
Big storm fronts and hurricanes require a vast amount of absorbent
chemicals to reduce their destructive power. To achieve the fast
turn-around times needed to complete their missions, flights of
returning C-130s taxi to a stop and immediately commence refueling as
the empty onboard spray canister is removed. as soon as the empty
canister is clear of the aircraft, a waiting truck wheels a
semi-trailer-size container of sky-seeding chemicals to the plane's
lowered rear ramp, where it is slid inside on rails like a gigantic
"soda dispenser".
The crew chief added that other spray missions spread (barium)
chemtrails to facilitate 3D radar mapping of the entire continental
United States. He also said that the air force has been spraying storm
fronts "for a long time". The military's main interest, he added, is
experimentation aimed at gaining control of the weather for military
use.
Did the air force spray this year's first Caribbean hurricane, in
which the western quadrant disintegrated just before making its Texas
landfall? "There's no reason they wouldn't," the crew chief replied.
But C-130 turboprops would not necessarily be used to try to influence
hurricanes that typically release more energy than all atomic arsenals
combined. Referring to the 757s recently modified for aerial spraying,
the crew chief told willthomas.net, "We've got them, but I can't talk
about them."
He added that many people in the air force "are aware of William
Thomas" and his reporting on chemtrails. The crew chief confirmed that
this reporter "has it mostly right" concerning the application and
purposes behind chemtrails. But would not elaborate on my reporting.
EUROPEAN CHEMTRAIL UPROAR
Meanwhile, the chemtrails controversy has taken Europe by storm
following a series of articles by Swiss freelance journalist Gabriel
Stetter in the German popular science magazine Raum+Zeit (Space and
Time), circulation circa 50,000.
Stetter's first article, "White Skies" created a public relations
nightmare for Greenpeace when it informed readers in January 2004 how
"Thousands of people were thoroughly shocked when they realised, and
were informed by Greenpeace in Germany, Switzerland and Austria
that-for some reason or other-Greenpeace has no interest in the
Chemtrail question whatsoever."
The Swiss government also came under public pressure to explain the
checkerboards being painted in its skies. On March 5, 2004 the
Environment Department in Berne, Switzerland responded to an inquiry
by Rudolf Rechsteiner, Social Democratic member of parliament,
admitting that "A number of ideas exist that show how it would be
possible to reduce global warming by technical means, at least in the
short term."
But these ideas, the government office hastened to add, "are no more
than theoretical. We are not aware of any practical application of
these methods, either at home or abroad."
Ten days later, Greenpeace Switzerland climate and transport expert
Cyrill Studer wrote an internal memo assuring colleagues that while he
had "heard of the chemtrails phenomenon," for the present, Greenpeace
"will not be following up the theme of chemtrails."
Two reasons for inaction by Greenpeace climate change activists were
given. First, Studer explained, "There is not a sufficiently solid
scientific basis" for Greenpeace to risk its budget and reputation
verifying this "supposed phenomenon". To do so, he added in his memo
to Greenpeace staff, "would overstretch our capacities.Important
elements of our climate campaign would suffer, particularly the
promotion of energy efficiency and of renewable energies, or our
active influence in present-day politics."
Outside Greenpeace's corporate offices, the controversy continued. On
June 11 German Greenpeace spokeswoman Kristine Läger told concerned
constituents:
The idea of reducing global warming by putting chemicals in the
atmosphere has been around a long time. There are various proposals in
this direction, suggesting the chemicals should be independently
sprayed and that they should be mixed with the fuel of ordinary
passenger aircraft. Whether in Germany such proposals have reached the
point of actual realization is highly questionable. So far as we are
aware there are no indications from research and observation of
weather and climate that these so-called chemtrails exist. Nor are we
aware of any project that has been realized in practice.. in all
probability this is not happening.
But Gabriel Stetter believes that the Greenpeace "Rainbow Warriors"
know all about the rainbows in the sky. They probably also know of
geoengineering studies to reduce incoming sunlight and slow global
warming issued by the National Academy of Sciences. "And they may even
have taken a look at the Welsbach Patent," he writes. "But they have
no idea what conclusions to draw from the chessboard pattern suspended
in the Hamburg sky or the aluminium-enriched 'rainbows'.
"Supposing the word 'chemtrails' appeared in print in the Greenpeace
Magazine," Stetter speculates. "How many tens of thousands of people
more would look up into the sky and recognize that the supposedly
Utopian "proposal" has long moved on via "spraying trials" to a
systematic, long-term spreading of cloud cover over the whole of
Europe?"
Back in Basel, Gabriel Stetter quoted unsourced opinion polls showing
that in this "stronghold" of chemtrails believers, one in ten people
"have already heard of them despite the media blackout. Several
thousand people in the prosperous town at the bend in the Rhine know
that the chemtrails phenomenon suggests that something is seriously
wrong."
Among these Swiss chemtrails activists, he explained, "are well-to-do
people, who because of their environmental awareness have been for a
long time, in some cases for decades, members of Greenpeace."
Not any more.
"Veteran anti-nuclear activists, campaigners for animal welfare or
against electrosmog-in their alarm they had all turned to Greenpeace
because of the chemtrails, which are visible everywhere in the skies
above Basel. But a painful experience awaited all of them. They were
palmed off with the same unsatisfactory answers that we have by now
grown tired of hearing. The consequence drawn by these elderly,
well-to-do activists from Greenpeace's lack of interest was the
immediate cancellation of membership of many years, the withdrawal of
legacies, and the withholding of payments to Greenpeace until further
notice."
As Brian Holmes notes on his website, www.holmestead.ca, the October
2004 issue #131 of the Raum + Zeit contained many pages of letters
from readers responding positively to Stetter's first article in issue
#127. "Many of these letters are illustrated with color photographs
supplied by the readers themselves."
Former six-year a board member of Greenpeace Germany, Monika Griefahn
chaired the Committee for Culture and Media of the Federal German
Parliament when she replied to a letter from two chemtrails dissenters
in July 2004, stating, "I am in basic agreement with your concerns.
Instead of making a concerted and determined effort to reduce
greenhouse gas emissions throughout the world, experiments of various
kinds are being carried out in the earth's atmosphere in order to cure
the symptoms."
GERMAN PARLIMENTARTIAN "ADMITS" CHEMTRAIL
Former six-year a board member of Greenpeace Germany, Monika Griefahn
chaired the Committee for Culture and Media of the Federal German
Parliament when she replied to a letter from two chemtrails dissenters
in July 2004, stating, "I am in basic agreement with your concerns.
Instead of making a concerted and determined effort to reduce
greenhouse gas emissions throughout the world, experiments of various
kinds are being carried out in the earth's atmosphere in order to cure
the symptoms."
After assuring her correspondents, "I share your concern over the use
of aluminium or barium compounds which have a considerable toxic
potential," the parliamentarian went on to say, "however, so far as I
am aware the extent of their use is so far minimal."
"At last!" Stetter announced in the German science magazine. "There we
have it. In the skies of Germany, so Social Democratic member of
Parliament Monika Griefahn tells us, aluminium and barium compounds
are being spread just as tens of thousands of concerned citizens have
observed, documented and bitterly deplored."
Thanking the Honorable Griefahn her for her courage, Stetter
suggested, "Maybe one day statues of politicians like Monika Griefahn
or the equally plucky US Congressman Dennis Kucinich will adorn in
marble splendor the squares of newly verdant German or American
cities."
That would be nice.
But the public outcry in Europe will have to spread to North America
if we are to stop this massive, illegal and continuing air and
atmospheric pollution.
Excerpted from Convergence Weekly.
.
|
|
| User: "Tom" |
|
| Title: Re: Your Chemtrail request Jane |
03 Sep 2005 01:12:06 PM |
|
|
<DaarkSyde@wherever.ca> wrote in message
news:6iejh1lgsntnp7f0rk9fmiirldbio66027@4ax.com...
<snip>
What an absolute fucking crock of fucing *****. Chemtrails, my hairy
hole. Kooktrails!
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Your Chemtrail request Jane |
03 Sep 2005 04:21:05 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 03 Sep 2005 18:12:06 GMT, "Tom" <no@no.com> wrote:
<DaarkSyde@wherever.ca> wrote in message
news:6iejh1lgsntnp7f0rk9fmiirldbio66027@4ax.com...
<snip>
What an absolute fucking crock of fucing *****. Chemtrails, my hairy
hole. Kooktrails!
Did you read the header there Tom, it was for Jane.But now it seems
like you may need an education as well, nah, just wait until October.
.
|
|
|
| User: "The CO" |
|
| Title: Re: Your Chemtrail request Jane |
03 Sep 2005 09:12:23 PM |
|
|
wrote:
Did you read the header there Tom, it was for Jane.But now it seems
like you may need an education as well,
Your ability to educate anyone would be dependent on you actually
knowing something. This is of course fallacious since you are clearly
an mentally challenged kook.
nah, just wait until October.
For? Another kookflood? Don't worry kookboi, I'll still be here
calling you a lying kook to your face until the sun goes out.
--
The CO
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Your Chemtrail request Jane |
04 Sep 2005 09:01:24 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 04 Sep 2005 11:42:23 +0930, The CO <the_xo@yahoo.com.au>
wrote:
DaarkSyde@wherever.ca wrote:
Did you read the header there Tom, it was for Jane.But now it seems
like you may need an education as well,
Your ability to educate anyone would be dependent on you actually
knowing something. This is of course fallacious since you are clearly
an mentally challenged kook.
nah, just wait until October.
For? Another kookflood? Don't worry kookboi, I'll still be here
calling you a lying kook to your face until the sun goes out.
Maybe I won't wait, for your benefit CO, insults and name calling
coming from a "kook" hahahahaha, pot and kettle there pal.
We shall see who is right , you won't have to wait long, two weeks
tops.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tom" |
|
| Title: Re: Your Chemtrail request Jane |
04 Sep 2005 12:50:38 PM |
|
|
<DaarkSyde@Zak.ca> wrote in message
news:ndvlh15ehklaud3fp3s0g959vgdmijvoq0@4ax.com...
On Sun, 04 Sep 2005 11:42:23 +0930, The CO <the_xo@yahoo.com.au>
wrote:
DaarkSyde@wherever.ca wrote:
Did you read the header there Tom, it was for Jane.But now it seems
like you may need an education as well,
Your ability to educate anyone would be dependent on you actually
knowing something. This is of course fallacious since you are clearly
an mentally challenged kook.
nah, just wait until October.
For? Another kookflood? Don't worry kookboi, I'll still be here
calling you a lying kook to your face until the sun goes out.
Maybe I won't wait, for your benefit CO, insults and name calling
coming from a "kook" hahahahaha, pot and kettle there pal.
LOL hardly... the CO is no kook. You, on the other hand..
We shall see who is right , you won't have to wait long, two weeks
tops.
Why's that then, kookboi? You going to expose the whole kooktrail
konspiracy? *snigger*
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Your Chemtrail request Jane |
04 Sep 2005 04:39:34 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 04 Sep 2005 17:50:38 GMT, "Tom" <no@no.com> wrote:
<DaarkSyde@Zak.ca> wrote in message
news:ndvlh15ehklaud3fp3s0g959vgdmijvoq0@4ax.com...
On Sun, 04 Sep 2005 11:42:23 +0930, The CO <the_xo@yahoo.com.au>
wrote:
DaarkSyde@wherever.ca wrote:
Did you read the header there Tom, it was for Jane.But now it seems
like you may need an education as well,
Your ability to educate anyone would be dependent on you actually
knowing something. This is of course fallacious since you are clearly
an mentally challenged kook.
nah, just wait until October.
For? Another kookflood? Don't worry kookboi, I'll still be here
calling you a lying kook to your face until the sun goes out.
Maybe I won't wait, for your benefit CO, insults and name calling
coming from a "kook" hahahahaha, pot and kettle there pal.
LOL hardly... the CO is no kook. You, on the other hand..
We shall see who is right , you won't have to wait long, two weeks
tops.
Why's that then, kookboi? You going to expose the whole kooktrail
konspiracy? *snigger*
We shall see who has the last laugh.
.
|
|
|
| User: "tw" |
|
| Title: Re: Your Chemtrail request Jane |
05 Sep 2005 02:29:27 AM |
|
|
<DaarkSyde@Zak.ca> wrote in message
news:ubqmh1l92bdm1onsfhao3gdqplhpiakkjf@4ax.com...
On Sun, 04 Sep 2005 17:50:38 GMT, "Tom" <no@no.com> wrote:
<DaarkSyde@Zak.ca> wrote in message
news:ndvlh15ehklaud3fp3s0g959vgdmijvoq0@4ax.com...
On Sun, 04 Sep 2005 11:42:23 +0930, The CO <the_xo@yahoo.com.au>
wrote:
DaarkSyde@wherever.ca wrote:
Did you read the header there Tom, it was for Jane.But now it seems
like you may need an education as well,
Your ability to educate anyone would be dependent on you actually
knowing something. This is of course fallacious since you are clearly
an mentally challenged kook.
nah, just wait until October.
For? Another kookflood? Don't worry kookboi, I'll still be here
calling you a lying kook to your face until the sun goes out.
Maybe I won't wait, for your benefit CO, insults and name calling
coming from a "kook" hahahahaha, pot and kettle there pal.
LOL hardly... the CO is no kook. You, on the other hand..
We shall see who is right , you won't have to wait long, two weeks
tops.
Why's that then, kookboi? You going to expose the whole kooktrail
konspiracy? *snigger*
We shall see who has the last laugh.
I'm laughing already kookboi. Kooktrails were debunked years ago.. just
becuase you're too fucking stupid to understand what a contrail is, doesn't
mean they don't exist. You're worse than the most brainwashed religous
fanatic. YOu and Tony are peas in a pod..
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "The CO" |
|
| Title: Re: Your Chemtrail request Jane |
05 Sep 2005 11:18:32 AM |
|
|
wrote:
We shall see who has the last laugh.
Oh how thrilling. I can hardly (yawn) wait.
Someone wake me for it...
--
The CO
.
|
|
|
| User: "tw" |
|
| Title: Re: Your Chemtrail request Jane |
06 Sep 2005 03:49:49 AM |
|
|
"The CO" <the_xo@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
news:431c6fd0$1_1@news.iprimus.com.au...
DaarkSyde@Zak.ca wrote:
We shall see who has the last laugh.
Oh how thrilling. I can hardly (yawn) wait.
Someone wake me for it...
Wale up cobber! We had the last laugh, he (surprisingly) can't back his crap
up. There..you can go back to sleep now.. sweet dreams, you might win the
last test ;-)
--
The CO
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Half-Mad" |
|
| Title: Re: Your Chemtrail request Jane |
04 Sep 2005 10:08:20 AM |
|
|
wrote:
On Sun, 04 Sep 2005 11:42:23 +0930, The CO <the_xo@yahoo.com.au>
wrote:
DaarkSyde@wherever.ca wrote:
nah, just wait until October.
We shall see who is right , you won't have to wait long, two weeks
tops.
Do you own a calendar?
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Your Chemtrail request Jane |
04 Sep 2005 01:30:10 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 04 Sep 2005 11:08:20 -0400, Half-Mad <half.mad@gmail.com>
wrote:
DaarkSyde@Zak.ca wrote:
On Sun, 04 Sep 2005 11:42:23 +0930, The CO <the_xo@yahoo.com.au>
wrote:
DaarkSyde@wherever.ca wrote:
nah, just wait until October.
We shall see who is right , you won't have to wait long, two weeks
tops.
Do you own a calendar?
Several, which one you interested in?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Art Deco" |
|
| Title: Re: Your Chemtrail request Jane |
05 Sep 2005 12:30:02 PM |
|
|
<DaarkSyde@wherever.ca> wrote:
Chemtrails Coming
Out Of The Closet?
By William Thomas
8-31-5
Nearly seven years after extensive "lay downs" of lingering and
spreading white plumes were first reported smearing skies over across
North America, Europe is in an uproar and Washington could be close to
coming clean about chemtrails.
Nothing about HAARP or scalar weapons here? What's up with that?
[screed flushed]
--
Official Associate AFA-B Vote Rustler
"The original human being was a female hermaphrodite with
both male and female genitalia."
"Human beings CAN NOT live in a solar system without a sun
with a ferrite core and a planet without a solid iron core."
-- Alexa Cameron, Kook of the Year 2004
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Your Chemtrail request Jane |
05 Sep 2005 10:44:38 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 05 Sep 2005 11:30:02 -0600, Art Deco <art_deco@127.0.0.1>
wrote:
<DaarkSyde@wherever.ca> wrote:
Chemtrails Coming
Out Of The Closet?
By William Thomas
8-31-5
Nearly seven years after extensive "lay downs" of lingering and
spreading white plumes were first reported smearing skies over across
North America, Europe is in an uproar and Washington could be close to
coming clean about chemtrails.
Nothing about HAARP or scalar weapons here? What's up with that?
[screed flushed]
Request noted and filled. You guys are missing all the fun over at
alt.prophecies.nostradamus.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
