| Topic: |
DEVELOP > c-Plus-Plus |
| User: |
"Alf P. Steinbach" |
| Date: |
24 Jan 2008 11:04:42 PM |
| Object: |
comp.lang.c++.moderated technical problems |
Due to some unresolved technical problems it seems that new clc++m
articles have not been propagated to Usenet for the last 24 hours or so.
I'll follow up to this posting when we know more or the problem is fixed.
Cheers,
- Alf, for the clc++m moderators
--
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is it such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
.
|
|
| User: "Alf P. Steinbach" |
|
| Title: Re: comp.lang.c++.moderated technical problems |
25 Jan 2008 12:06:49 PM |
|
|
* Alf P. Steinbach:
Due to some unresolved technical problems it seems that new clc++m
articles have not been propagated to Usenet for the last 24 hours or so.
I'll follow up to this posting when we know more or the problem is fixed.
I'm happy to report that articles posted to clc++m are now propagated.
Cheers,
- Alf
--
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is it such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
.
|
|
|
| User: "kwikius" |
|
| Title: Re: comp.lang.c++.moderated technical problems |
25 Jan 2008 01:58:35 PM |
|
|
On Jan 25, 6:06=A0pm, "Alf P. Steinbach" <al...@start.no> wrote:
* Alf P. Steinbach:
Due to some unresolved technical problems it seems that new clc++m
articles have not been propagated to Usenet for the last 24 hours or so.=
I'll follow up to this posting when we know more or the problem is fixed=
..
I'm happy to report that articles posted to clc++m are now propagated.
Could you wave your magic wand over comp.std.c++ too?
regards
Andy Little
.
|
|
|
| User: "Alf P. Steinbach" |
|
| Title: Re: comp.lang.c++.moderated technical problems |
26 Jan 2008 03:50:21 AM |
|
|
* kwikius:
On Jan 25, 6:06 pm, "Alf P. Steinbach" <al...@start.no> wrote:
* Alf P. Steinbach:
Due to some unresolved technical problems it seems that new clc++m
articles have not been propagated to Usenet for the last 24 hours or so.
I'll follow up to this posting when we know more or the problem is fixed.
I'm happy to report that articles posted to clc++m are now propagated.
Could you wave your magic wand over comp.std.c++ too?
Possibly e-mailing James Dennett or Fergus Henderson (active csc++
moderators) would do the trick.
See <url: http://www.comeaucomputing.com/csc/faq.html#A6>.
Hasten to add: I can't take credit for fixing the clc++m propagation
problem, and we don't really know -- but Daveed tried poking with
/his/ wand in the innards of the archaic, convoluted server scripts,
removing a suspect lock, and somehow things started working when he
indicated that now could be a good time to test again.
Cheers, & hth.,
- Alf
--
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is it such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
.
|
|
|
| User: "kwikius" |
|
| Title: Re: comp.lang.c++.moderated technical problems |
27 Jan 2008 03:12:01 AM |
|
|
On Jan 26, 9:50=A0am, "Alf P. Steinbach" <al...@start.no> wrote:
* kwikius:
Could you wave your magic wand over comp.std.c++ too?
Possibly e-mailing James Dennett or Fergus Henderson (active csc++
moderators) would do the trick.
See <url:http://www.comeaucomputing.com/csc/faq.html#A6>.
I have done so. It may be worth someone else trying too.
regards
Andy Little
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
