Library to use



 DEVELOP > c-Plus-Plus > Library to use

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: DEVELOP > c-Plus-Plus
User: "Paolini"
Date: 15 Oct 2003 09:38:53 PM
Object: Library to use
Please you correct to me if mistake.
Task not to be off-topic why the general section of the message is reported
to the C like language in its complex.
If I write programs that as an example use the Qt
library must together be present and installed in the system.
If viceversa use cstdio.h remains like inner library and therefore me enough
to copy the program that would have to go.
Wanting to only make of the elementary things, I would want to only use
internal libraryes but I do not know what I can use with GCC compiling rows
cpp beyond cstdio.h.
I make an example in Win even if I know that in linux not there are the DLL
but with the library the concept would have to be similar.
If you made a program in Pascal as an example once compiled, would work
simply copying the binary in the system.
If use of the reference to external members es. DLL goes installs to you and
correctly resolved.
If I use dll normally registred can be that is possible use it without
install it.
Where is possible find libraries present on gcc without necessity to install
other that the binary program?
.

User: ""

Title: Re: Library to use 16 Oct 2003 02:28:05 AM
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 02:38:53 GMT, Paolini <paolini@alfa.it> wrote:

Please you correct to me if mistake.
Task not to be off-topic why the general section of the message is
reported
to the C like language in its complex.

If I write programs that as an example use the Qt
library must together be present and installed in the system.
If viceversa use cstdio.h remains like inner library and therefore me
enough
to copy the program that would have to go.
Wanting to only make of the elementary things, I would want to only use
internal libraryes but I do not know what I can use with GCC compiling
rows
cpp beyond cstdio.h.

I make an example in Win even if I know that in linux not there are the
DLL
but with the library the concept would have to be similar. If you made a
program in Pascal as an example once compiled, would work
simply copying the binary in the system. If use of the reference to
external members es. DLL goes installs to you and
correctly resolved.
If I use dll normally registred can be that is possible use it without
install it.

Where is possible find libraries present on gcc without necessity to
install
other that the binary program?


And why are you afraid of installing programs that are open source ?.
Most likely you will get much better diagnostics about what is missing
in your system and what to do about it.
You are doing fine , so try it.
--
grzegorz
.

User: "d2003xx"

Title: Re: Library to use 16 Oct 2003 08:59:04 AM
Paolini <paolini@alfa.it> wrote in message news:<1xnjb.39317$vO5.1455495@twister1.libero.it>...

Please you correct to me if mistake.
Task not to be off-topic why the general section of the message is reported
to the C like language in its complex.

If I write programs that as an example use the Qt
library must together be present and installed in the system.

Not if you link Qt with your programs statically.

If viceversa use cstdio.h remains like inner library and therefore me enough
to copy the program that would have to go.
Wanting to only make of the elementary things, I would want to only use
internal libraryes but I do not know what I can use with GCC compiling rows
cpp beyond cstdio.h.

Eh???


I make an example in Win even if I know that in linux not there are the DLL

In linux, it's called "Dynamic Shared Object".

but with the library the concept would have to be similar.
If you made a program in Pascal as an example once compiled, would work
simply copying the binary in the system.
If use of the reference to external members es. DLL goes installs to you and
correctly resolved.
If I use dll normally registred can be that is possible use it without
install it.

What does your "normally registered" mean??


Where is possible find libraries present on gcc without necessity to install
other that the binary program?

No. The only method to avoid all the mass is to link your programs
statically, or make it not to rely on any libraries (i.e. use system
call directly.. but this is very stupid)
.


  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER