overloaded global operator new/new[] and corresponding deletes question



 DEVELOP > c-Plus-Plus > overloaded global operator new/new[] and corresponding deletes question

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: DEVELOP > c-Plus-Plus
User: "Dodo"
Date: 25 Aug 2003 05:08:56 PM
Object: overloaded global operator new/new[] and corresponding deletes question
I have overloaded the global new/delete operators with
something like this (simplified):
void *operator new(size_t size)
{
...allocation code...
}
void operator delete(void * p)
{
...allocation code...
}
void *operator new[](size_t size)
{
...deallocation code...
}
void operator delete[](void * p)
{
...dealocation code...
}
Now given these overloaded ops, I try following code:
char *p = new char[100];
....
delete [] p;
What is the correct new/delete pair of allocators that will be used?
My problem is that under VC6, SP5 I always get new(size_t)/delte(void *)
as allocators/dealocators. Same code under VC7.1 (.NET 2003) and
Intel C++ 7.1 links to new(size_t)/delete[](void *). At this point I am
puzzled.
Isn't the correct linkage new[](size_t)/delete[](void *) even for scalar
types?
Thanks!
.

User: "Ron Natalie"

Title: Re: overloaded global operator new/new[] and corresponding deletes question 26 Aug 2003 08:59:21 AM
"Dodo" <prokopcho.OBVIOUSREMOVE@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:bie1dr$83450

Isn't the correct linkage new[](size_t)/delete[](void *) even for scalar
types?

That is right (you mean for non-class types). Scalar just means not array.
.


  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER