| Topic: |
DEVELOP > c-Plus-Plus |
| User: |
"" |
| Date: |
02 Oct 2006 05:16:32 AM |
| Object: |
QUERY: Borland C++ 4.5 vs Borland Turbo C++ 1.01 |
Am wondering whether Borland C++ 4.5 or Borland Turbo C++ 1.01
supported C++ templates. If not, which
other future version of BC++ or TC++ did? If BC++ 4.5 or TC++ 1.01 does
support it, how much of the
C++ language does it support.
.
|
|
| User: "SuperKoko" |
|
| Title: Re: QUERY: Borland C++ 4.5 vs Borland Turbo C++ 1.01 |
02 Oct 2006 05:57:26 AM |
|
|
wrote:
Am wondering whether Borland C++ 4.5 or Borland Turbo C++ 1.01
supported C++ templates.
AFAIK, Turbo C++ 1.01 doesn't support templates, but Borland C++ 4.5
does. But the support is not very good.
I know quite well Borland C++ 5.0. And, I can say it doesn't support
member templates, but it supports default template parameters and
partial specialization of template classes.
An annoying thing with Borland C++ 5.0 (and thus, probably Borland C++
4.5) is that the iostream library is not templatized and is not in
namespace std, though the STL is in namespace std.
If not, which
other future version of BC++ or TC++ did? If BC++ 4.5 or TC++ 1.01 does
support it, how much of the
C++ language does it support.
Borland C++ 5.5 has a much better support for templates than previous
versions.
It has a full support (with a few minor bugs) of templates, including
member templates of template and non-template classes.
It's enough to program comfortably, using all the language.
But, AFAIK, Borland C++ 5.5 is not available as 16 bits compiler.
You can download it freely on Borland's web site.
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
