| Topic: |
DEVELOP > c-Plus-Plus |
| User: |
"George2" |
| Date: |
21 Dec 2007 06:12:51 AM |
| Object: |
Reference are always lvalue? |
Hello everyone,
Is the conclusion correct? Both const reference and non-const
reference are lvalue?
I think it is true and I can not find a sample which does not follow
it.
thanks in advance,
George
.
|
|
| User: "Victor Bazarov" |
|
| Title: Re: Reference are always lvalue? |
21 Dec 2007 08:24:17 AM |
|
|
George2 wrote:
Is the conclusion correct? Both const reference and non-const
reference are lvalue?
I think it is true and I can not find a sample which does not follow
it.
If an expression has the type 'reference to T', it's an lvalue. See
[expr]/6. I presume by "const reference" and "non-const reference"
you actually mean "reference to const" and "reference to non-const".
V
--
Please remove capital 'A's when replying by e-mail
I do not respond to top-posted replies, please don't ask
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
